Okay, so I watch Oprah. Occasionally. I go to the gym around 4:00 PM, it’s on, and I watch it. There, I said it.
Yesterday Bill Cosby was on Oprah talking about his new book, Come On People: On the Path from Victims to Victors. Over the past year Cosby traveled the country to spread the word about the violence and lack of education faced by minority youth in the United States. The campaign in principle is a noble one (although he has faced criticism,) but for me it was something that Cosby said at the end of the show that I found particularily worrisome:
From Oprah.com:
(Cosby) says he has a friend who thinks parents can keep track of their kids by adopting the “shake down” philosophy used by prison guards. “He talks to his congregation, telling parents why they don’t have to knock on a door…a bedroom door…of a child, and say, ‘May I come in?’” Bill says. “Why? Because you don’t pay any rent. This is not your place.” Parents need to know all about what their children are doing—they should look under beds, monitor Internet usage, know who their friends are, Bill says.
While I completely agree that parents should be aware of their children’s lives, there is something to be said for privacy and respect, and how vital those two things are in the raising of a child. I’ve written before about how raising children in a pseudo-police state can be problematic if not demoralizing for some. And I certainly don’t believe the solution to teen violence and drug abuse is rummaging through your kid’s stuff and saying “you have no rights because you don’t pay rent.” Maybe I’m naive, I believe that many teens understand that when their parents respect their privacy they do so out of trust, and the mutual respect that comes from that goes a long way in “keeping kids out of trouble.”
Cosby’s justification for a “shakedown?” “This is part of love, and this is what we have to do.”
(I’m not alone in thinking Cosby’s theories have their faults; AlterNet is calling him out on his perpetuation of racial stereotypes.)
I wonder what our readers think. Is it right to strip teens of their privacy for “their own good?” Or do you think that can simply exacerbate the problem?




Digg
four comments
The notion that you have to pay rent in order to get your parents to respect your privacy basically equates citizenship with property-owning, or affluence, or something sketchy and rather undemocratic like that - i.e. that until you start actively contributing to the economy you're not really a person with rights. Arguably this is a pretty common way of looking at things - consider homeless people and the way they're perceived socially and legally - but that doesn't mean it's the kind of thing that should be perpetuated in family life.
Maybe the idea behind it is that "I have more life experience than you, as demonstrated by the fact that I maintain/own this dwelling in which you also habitate, and therefore you should respect my decisions," but it doesn't sound like that the way it's being phrased here.
Posted by Anna
October 19, 2007, 7:09 PM
Anna, you've summed up my feelings exactly. I think it's an age old story that kids who are policed in the home simply act out in extreme ways once they're "released."
I had a conversation with a mother of a nine year old girl who confessed she had installed software to monitor the chats her daughter had online. She did so to ensure that her daughter wasn't talking to anyone who wasn't also nine years old, and I personally saw no problem with that. The mother did so with apprehension, and stated that she pretty much ignored the general content of the chats and was just keeping an eye out for predators. That, I have no problem with. That seemed like a good mix of respecting her daughters freedom to use technology in her home while keeping a watchful eye on the things her daughter may not be equipped to be wary of.
That sort of "watching out for your safety" tactic seems very different to the prison guard shakedown that's being advocated here. I feel like there can be a healthy mix of knowledge and respect- consistently infringing on your kids privacy means they can't feel comfortable in the home.
Posted by Stacey May
October 20, 2007, 7:54 AM
I agree with you both. My parents took the door off of my room, removed my radio/books/any other form of entertainment, and made me stay there for 90% of my time at home. I was borrowing their clothes without permission. They told me I was stealing. I lived under the "my house, my rules, or you can leave and fend for yourself" theory from the time I was 12 and my stepmom packed a suitcase and threatened to throw me out. (I had forged a progress report because I was getting a D in science.)
The result? Oh, I went ape-shit when I got to college and promptly flunked out my freshman year. I eventually got it out of my system, but I have a tenuous relationship with my parents to this day.
Shakedowns and prison atmosphere can scar your relationship with your child for life. After years of therapy, I still fear my parents.
I advocate learning about your child and using the techniques that work best: every kid is different.
Posted by Amy
October 21, 2007, 6:12 PM
Anna, Stacey May, and Amy, I wholeheartedly agree with all of you. The Victorians raised their kids under a strict atmosphere, and their kids grew up to be wild, crazy, drinking, partying flappers.
Posted by Sexy Sadie
November 8, 2007, 4:56 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.