stef lenk and Shannon Gerard‘s “Playing Doctor” exhibition has been pulled from the York University Bookstore window only 7 days after it was installed. The reason? Some higher-ups at the University demanded it’s removal. Apparently a nameless professor who lives on the campus found it offensive and was afraid his son might see it.
The exhibit actually happily hung in Toronto’s Pages Bookstore’s front window for a while, celebrating the dual launch of lenk and Gerrard’s books at a This is Not a Reading Series event back in August.
Richelle at BlogTO reports:
I asked the gallery’s Assistant Curator, Emelie Chhangur to describe what was in the window of the bookstore: “Playing Doctor was comprised of lenk’s operating table and Gerard’s cut out figures of a man and a woman with crocheted boobs and dinks, (the parts of the male/female body affected by cancer). Gerard’s books, and video + small “kits” contain DIY instructions on how to check yourself for testicular and breast cancer. lenk’s operating table brings it home with reference to the children’s game, this time with hand drawn body parts and a hand painted figure on the table. The art work is fantastic, fun, accessible, and educational.”
How a giant board game and information about cancer could taint a child is beyond me.
I was at the TINARS launch in August and was particularily moved by what Gerard was aiming to accomplish with her detection kits. Her honesty regarding her and her partner’s own experiences with “finding a lump” and her bravery in expressing it through her work was inspiring. In my view, the “kits” she had on offer at the event were a real step in the right direction; they opened up an early detection dialogue, and aimed to make people comfortable and aware of their bodies in order to save their lives. Her entire performance (which included a an informative yet hilarious video) humanized and inspired.
Both lenk and Gerard’s work is specific to the female body in an uncommonly non-sexualized way; with their images they point to an empowered awareness and self-ownership, which I would argue is very feminist.
This kind of ridiculous censorship is a disgrace.




Digg
10 comments
I can't believe this! I was admiring their work at York last week and was really proud that I went to a school that would proudly display such brave feminist work. Outrage!
Posted by Nicole
October 17, 2007, 5:07 PM
Yup, I'm infuriated over this. Both of their work is so fantastic, positive, feminist and worthy of so much praise.
I was at Ladyfest and one of the teen girls in the audience at an event was talking to me about how she had seen the exhibit and it changed her life.
This kind of censorship is appalling.
Posted by Stacey May
October 17, 2007, 5:15 PM
FYI: there's a great commentary over here by Christopher Butcher...
http://comics212.net/2007/10/17/cock-...
Posted by Stacey May
October 17, 2007, 5:48 PM
That is a pretty odd thing to censor. It reminds me of those Bell ads of yore that had ovaries cut out as an example of good censorship.
One time some folks at York censored the work of a feminist art collective I was part of. The exhibit was in a public hall way as part of an art festival. Someone was offended by kraft paper and a blue painted outline of my friend's body, because inside her frame she painted names and words she's been called throughout her life. They told us some of those terms (bitch, cunt, whore) are shocking when looked at lifesize and "out of context." What's interesting is that no one had any objection to sexy naked photos of us hung in the same area, even though those were equally "out of context." (Part of our project was about our personal experience with sexual abuse.)
Even more interesting is that part of our work focused on the sexist advertising York has all over capmus.
That said, York's Glendon campus once allowed me to build 15-foot-tall red tent in the cafeteria where I talked about menstruation for 8 hours.
*sigh* Those were the days...
Posted by Erin
October 17, 2007, 5:53 PM
Link to Bell ad mentioned in previous comment:
http://www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimateb...
Posted by Erin
October 17, 2007, 5:54 PM
Oh damn Erin, link still not working!
I don't know what to say about this. On the one hand its so totally discouraging and deflating, and on the other hand it's not surprising at all. I went to a more conservative university than York where I could see a thing like this happening. But York has a reputation for being somewhat progressive - and they've papered the TTC with ads for their "interdisciplinary university" and their genuine and innovative approaches to current problems just like breast cancer.
You'd think that personal testimonials on cancer, and art work that also acts as early detection kits, would be something interdisciplinary and innovative enough for York to display proudly.
Posted by Thea
October 17, 2007, 6:23 PM
Wow, I can't believe this. Well, in fact I can believe it. Any images that present women's bodies as matter of fact parts, not just sexualized and victimized, are suspect in our culture. I want to know why the bookstore felt intimidated to take this down after ONE comment from a prof. If they were afraid of controversy, now they are going to get it.
It just so happens that the next issue of Shameless has a short piece by Shannon Gerrard on her love of the work of another graphic artist who dares to put images of her body and its blood and guts and courage into her work: Julie Doucet. Check it out in January 2008.
Posted by piKe
October 17, 2007, 6:33 PM
Stacey May:
Thank you so much for your support! It means a lot to me.
Posted by Shannon Gerard
October 18, 2007, 8:40 AM
You can contact the York University Complaints Centre:
York University Complaint Centre, 103 Central Square; telephone 416-736-5144.
Or the bookstore directly:
York Lanes, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON Canada M3J 1P3
(416) 736-5024
Until we know exactly what "secret collective ordered the work removed" that will have to do in the way of contacts to send complaints to.
Posted by Stacey May
October 18, 2007, 2:39 PM
I thought that booth at TCAF was really sweet and a really awesome way to make people comfortable with the subject matter.
But yes, the fact that a professor is afraid of telling his boy what a 'dink' could be an allusion to is much more important?
Posted by Danielle
October 18, 2007, 10:52 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.