Hey team — inaugural Wired Wednesday post. w00t!
And I’m kicking it off with the hugely sexy topic of… hi-def optical disc formats!
No, come on, it’s gonna be good. I know, I should do all the shiny this week — when robots fall and Rock Band and Google 411 in Canada. And we’ll get there, I promise.
For this week though, we’re going practical. Because there’s nothing more Shameless than walking into a tech store and knowing your stuff.
I figured that if someone reasonably geeky, like myself, used to wonder WTF was the difference between Blu-ray and DVD and HD DVD, someone else was probably wondering too (though possibly with less profanity). And in the interests of spreading tech-savvyness amongst teh ladehs, I’ve written up below the cliffs notes to hi-def discs. What they are. What battle Blu-ray just “won”. And what to do with all your DVDs (<-keep them). Etc.
But first something from xkcd that has absolutely nothing to do with that:
Ahem, so, without further distractions: WTF is Blu-ray
What’s the difference between Blu-ray and regular DVDs?
About 5x the amount of storage. A standard single-layer DVD stores just under 5GB of data. A single-layer Blu-ray disc stores 25GB. Or 26214400KB. Or… whatever, you’re with me.
But all that means is that optical disc technology is catching up with the existing high quality output options. We’ve had these huge high definition TVs around for a while now, but you just can’t stuff enough data onto a regular DVD to take full advantage of them.
With a hi-def optical disc, like Blu-ray, films can be recorded sharper, crisper, more colour/sound/everything-rich. They’re what these high-definition TVs are built for. Literally.
(Because if you don’t have high-definition media to go with your high-definition TV all it does is make everything look worse. It’s like walking into a candlelit dinner and flicking on overhead fluorescent lighting. Nothing looks prettier.)
Some hi-end players will “upscale” and try to pretty up the regular formats you’re putting in. But the real experience means investing in a high-definition player and high-definition discs. But which high-definition solution to get?
What is/was the news?
About a month ago, Blu-ray won the high definition optical disc format war. Blu-ray (backed by Sony) was up against HD DVD (backed by Toshiba and Microsoft) to be “The” format for high-definition media storage.
The Blu-ray name was a little misleading (it’s actually named after the colour of laser used to read and write off the disc: a Blu-ray laser is blue, a regular DVD laser is red). Because if you have a high-definition TV aren’t you looking for a high-definition video? Yes. So doesn’t that mean you want HD DVD? No. Because even though HD DVD has a more intuitive acronym, Blu-Ray is also high-definition video. They’re doing the same thing. (It was sort of like one car company calling their new car “Car”).
All that meaning it’s been a big old mess in high-definition optical discs and players for the last, oh, 8 years. Because Blu-ray and HD DVD were looking to fill exactly the same need. The same need, addressed two different ways on two different formats with two different players.
Which is why it was such a big deal when HD DVD ran up the white flag. Because a whole lotta people with disposable incomes had remodeled their dens, bought big plasma or LCD flat-panel TVs, and 5.1 surround sound, then they put on their silk PJs, buttered their popcorn, and had nothing to watch.
Well, not nothing exactly. They just had to take a big ol’ gamble with yet another big chunk of money, and bet on which format was going to win when they bought their hi-def player. Because…shocker coming…for the most part, HD-DVDs don’t work on Blu-ray players and Blu-ray discs don’t work on HD-DVD players. Okay, so not shocking at all. Because while the future might be friendly, proprietary solutions aren’t.
Oh sweet jeebus, is this like when CDs came out? VHS became obsolete? Betamax kicked it? Do I have to replace everything? Again?
Yes and no. You’ve only been betamaxed if you bought HD DVDs and an HD DVD player. There are a few players that read both Blu-Ray and HD DVD discs. But the market has basically said tough noogies to you, and all you can do is hoard components and existing HD DVD movies. The great offloading has already begun over at amazon.ca. (Oh, and by the way Amazon? “Save 50% on HD DVDs for a Limited Time Only”? Sucks to that. Limited time until they start giving them away free with purchase.)
If, however, you stuck with your DVDs and DVD player, you’re fine. Blu-ray is the official new hi-end format, but it’s not replacing the standard DVD anytime soon. And unlike the great divide between VHS and DVD (where you have to lovingly coax and duct tape a little more life out of your VCR), there’s a good chance you’ll be able to play your old DVDs on new Blu-ray players.
Just bear in mind that while it looks like a DVD and tastes like a DVD, Blu-ray discs are not DVDs. They’re both optical discs, but they’re not interchangeable — they’re recorded and read differently (blue vs red). So if you go newfangled, make sure that your Blu-ray player is DVD-compatible.
So is it worth getting a Blu-ray player now?
Meh. One of the reasons that Blu-ray wasn’t triumphant earlier is that the player is so friggin’ expensive. It was only when Sony included one essentially free as part of their Playstation 3, that any significant number of people even had a Blu-ray player.
Buying a Blu-ray player as part of the PS3 remains the most cost-effective way to own one. Though even that ain’t cheap. Even the 40GB PS3 is hovering around $400. But that’s still at least $100 cheaper than a standalone Blu-ray player.
And then there is the stupid high price tag of the Blu-ray discs themselves ($25 on sale, $40ish otherwise). So, conclusion: for everyday movie watching, your DVDs and DVD player ain’t broke.
However.
If you do decide to get a Blu-ray player, I’d definitely go the PS3 route. Because then you can watch movies (yes, it’s DVD-compatible) and play videogames.
But we’ll talk about those next time. :)




Digg
seven comments
OoooOoOOOOOOOooohhhhh. Thanks Catherine! I will no longer wander around the Sony Store muttering to myself about coloured lasers! I'm going to be so much better informed from here on in...
I also appreciate how patiently you are explaining this, along with demonstrative photos of popcorn. I'm often too embarrassed to ask about tech stuff, or give up before I even try to understand/ask.
This is not because I'm dense but because I feel like I've fallen too far behind, that as a teenager I could've tried to learn about this stuff but didn't. Because back then whenever I revealed that I didn't know something by, uh, asking a perfectly good question, I remember people getting irritated with me and making some comment about how girls don't know anything. Hm, most of the "girls are not good at tech" messages that I've internalised came when I was a teenager. Does anyone else have adolescent sob stories of being ridiculed over tech?
But here's my question: how did Blu-Ray win? Did something big happen to bring this about? Or did HD DVD release a press release saying "we're just not that good"? Please, I want the juicy details. Tech gossip!
Posted by Thea
March 12, 2008, 12:37 PM
He he... yeah, I had a section of howdidithappen gossip in there, but cut it because my entry was just so long.
But since you asked. :)
The fact that Sony (who developed Blu-ray) included a "free" Blu-ray player as part of the PS3 was a major factor. Microsoft, true to form, was sort of including HD DVD as part of the XBox 360 -- in that you could buy an HD DVD player as a separate peripheral. (Also the 360 sucks.)
So when PS3 hit the market at the end of 2006, suddenly a whole new group of people by default now also owned Blu-ray players. (HD DVD coffin nail #1)
Other than the PS3 factor, it really came down to movie studios, and Wal-mart. Studios were mostly split in their allegiance to one format or the other. Only a few were releasing in both HD DVD and Blu Ray. Lots of the big ones (inc Paramount and Warner Bros) flipped back and forth, alternately supporting one or the other. That's what I mean by a big ol' mess.
At the beginning of this year, Warner Bros declared their hard core support for Blu-ray only (nail #2). And the final death knell came from Wal-mart last month, who announced that they were phasing HD DVD out of their stores (nail #3).
On February 19th this year, four days after Wal-mart's announcement, Toshiba said they were discontinuing development and support on the HD DVD format. And then all remaining film studios said "us too".
Microsoft is currently in talks with Sony about developing a Blu-ray player for the 360.
Posted by Catherine
March 12, 2008, 1:09 PM
Engadget with a history of the format war.
Also, years of internet forum fanboy/fangirl blather compels me to suggest the Xbox 360 is a fine, upstanding console that you should be happy to own as well. (Never mind the fact that I own only a PS3 and love it to bits.) As Blu-ray players go, the PS3 is actually a very good choice, mainly because it's upgradeable to Blu-ray Profile 2.0, which allows publishers to include internet-based features and whatnot; other players aren't as easily upgradeable (or not at all in most cases) and so will be locked to Profile 1.1 or, even worse, Profile 1.0 (no picture-in-picture commentaries!).
Posted by Wesley
March 12, 2008, 6:40 PM
I own an Xbox 360, and I stand by my assessment of its suckage.
The biggest plus of the 360 is a comparatively large selection of games. One of many minuses is that a particularly high proportion of 360 games are crappy and socially regressive.
Another is that the 360 is the most unbelievably loud console when it's running. The fans run so loud that I actually have to turn up the volume on the receiver so I can hear the game.
Maybe we'll hash this out in a dedicated next-gen gaming post...
Posted by Catherine
March 12, 2008, 10:26 PM
Thea -- I hope that's a gap 'Wired Wednesdays' can help fill. There's a lot of chest beating in tech, and a lot of it is total nonsense.
It's not that everyone else knows, they often just know a little and fudge the rest. Or know a lot about one thing and get all nit-picky and condescending with new people to make them feel like they don't know as much. And god help you if you mispronounce something...
Must. not. rant. :)
Anyways -- Wired Wednesdays can absolutely be an interactive feature. I'll just ramble on about whatever tech thing I'm thinking of. But if someone posts a question or has a topic they'd like me to look into, I'm on it.
Posted by Catherine
March 13, 2008, 11:33 AM
Gotta side with Catherine on the suckage of the X-box 360.
The worst thing about the super-loud fans is that they still don't resolve the 360's big issues with overheating. Ours is overheated and in the shop for the second time (and we're not heavy duty gamers by any means!)
Google "Three rings of death" to learn more about chronic 360 overheating.
Posted by H
March 13, 2008, 2:01 PM
Oh, don't get me wrong, I didn't buy a 360 precisely because a 30% failure rate, paying for Xbox Live, and not being able to swap in your own hard drive without paying Microsoft tons of cash for the privilege were all pretty much deal breakers. (Plus the PS3 has Wipeout HD. When I die, I want to be buried in a super-futuristic anti-gravity racing hovercraft. Yes.)
I just thought, you know, equal time provisions and all.
Posted by Wesley
March 13, 2008, 7:43 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.