Christie Blatchford has an interesting piece in today’s Globe and Mail about the tendency for female athletes to appear in magazines, and sometimes on the cover, nekked. Or at least, naked but for a carefully placed volleyball.
The athlete pictured there is Waneek Horn-Miller, Canada’s Olympic water polo team co-captain.
In the article, Horn-Miller, a Mohawk from Kahnawake, Que had this to say about her appearance on the cover of Canadian Time:
“Look,” she told The Globe and Mail, “It’s one chance every four years to get out an image of a healthy athletic woman instead of an underweight, underage model. Athletes’ bodies are much healthier — and they’re functional!”She says after she did the Time cover, “People told me it was something they’d show to their daughters. I mean, I was obsessed like everyone else with fashion magazines when I was a teenager. It’s natural to look for the body ideal.”
But with a female athlete, she says, readers can see that “Here is a woman, a great athlete, 160 pounds, who can bench-press her own body weight and squat 180 pounds.”
“Let’s face it,” she says, “as humans, we like the physically good-looking, the beautiful.
“But how much better if she’s also the fastest woman in the world? It makes the ideal of beauty have so many more dimensions. It’s not just, ‘I’m skinny and I have fake boobs.’ ”
Blatchford lets the athletes speak for themselves regarding their decision to make use of their sex appeal, and the reasons why, but she does suggest that unlike the sellout 1998 edition of Playboy featuring figure skater Katarina Witt, today’s audience may find the idea of naked female athletes a little well, bo-ring. She writes:
“The world is a much friendlier place to disrobing athletes than it was once.”Indeed, when just last week outside the Olympic Village here, Ms. Beard unveiled an anti-fur poster of herself for PETA — People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the group that recently distinguished itself by coming up with an advertisement that uses the tragic beheading of a young man on a Greyhound bus to decry the inhumane treatment of animals slaughtered for meat — it was greeted with nearly a yawn.
“Amanda Beard: Nude Again” read a headline in the Los Angeles Times after the 26 year-old blonde showed off the poster, a neat reflection of the blasé reaction that now greets stripping athletes.
What do you think? Is it just par for the course, a little too much, or totally awesome to see women athletes strutting *all* of their stuff during the Beijing Olympics?


Digg
seven comments
I can sort of see Horn-Miller's point about healthy female bodies but personally I feel that instead of expanding our definition of beauty women should stop accepting the idea that we have to be beautiful to be of some worth.
It almost seems obligatory at this point for female athletes, musicians and actors to at least do a sexy cover of Maxim etc. I've had enough of the media focus on women's bodies
and I do think that every woman who does something like this makes it harder for the women who come after her to avoid falling into this trap.
How much better if the fastest woman in the world didn't feel the need to have a beautiful body?
Posted by C.K.
August 13, 2008, 12:50 PM
Um. *hides her precious screenies of Ekaterina Gordeeva doing the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition* I am a total suckup for this trend and I wish more male athletes did it. Fortunately they are wont to take their shirts off from time to time...
*coughs* I am an irredeemable pervert when it comes to sports. I am also not convinced that there's anything wrong with that - what's wrong is that it's expected for female athletes to go along with that, but not male ones.
...*saves Horn-Miller picture*
Posted by Thene
August 13, 2008, 1:02 PM
"what's wrong is that it's expected for female athletes to go along with that, but not male ones."
I don't think *anyone* should be expected to go along with it but there's definitely more pressure on women to do this now than there is on men.
Posted by C.K.
August 13, 2008, 1:15 PM
Black Tights is an excellent book about women & sport. I'd recommend it to, well anyone, but definitely anyone particularly interested in the issues facing women in athletics.
A few excerpts from Chapter 5: "Whose Body Is This?: Women Athletes in the Media" --
"As the Games became increasingly commercialized, women's outfits grew smaller and smaller, and photos that focused on their crotches and butts became ever more frequent.
...
Most shots of female athletes focus exclusively on the crotch and butt, while breasts are the focus when non-athletic women are depicted. Typically, women athletes are quite small-breasted -- a byproduct of greater physical efficiency and leanness, but not the North American ideal when the female body is offered up for male viewing and consumption, so those who serve up images of female athletes usually downplay their 'disappointing' busts.
...
Were all these crotch shots used as just part of a series of photographs showing women athletes in a full range of human movement, perhaps there wouldn't be such a problem. But women athletes disappear from the media's radar screen once the Olympic Games are over, so these shots are never seen as part of a whole.
...
At least women receive some attention while the Olympics are on. But if you were to check the sports section even two days after the Games have ended, you would see that everything is back to abnormal."
Posted by Catherine
August 13, 2008, 1:43 PM
Just realized all the bits I copied above were about images taken of athletes, less specifically about images athletes explicitly posed for. That's in there too though. :)
"I looked at Gabrielle Reece's spread with an American photographer, and he candidly told me how he and his colleagues convince women to do what the photographers want. 'The most important part of the process is to make her think everything is her idea,' he said. 'So when [Reece] uses the [first-person] plural, as in "our goal," she's doing exactly what the photographer wants. She's imagining she has some say in the shot. The whole idea, though, is to get her to do things she wouldn't have though of herself, and wouldn't necessarily initially want to do.'
This does seem to be the case. It's pretty hard to imagine how Reece could think the words 'really powerful' describe the woman in the photos.
...
Sadly, I believe that every time a woman athlete poses nude, she makes it harder for the rest of us to have a respected and private experience while we try to enjoy our sport."
I don't agree with every conclusion Laura Robinson reaches in Black Tights, but she does put some important consequences up for discussion.
Posted by Catherine
August 13, 2008, 1:58 PM
There's an article comparing some of the male and female Australian Olympic uniforms here:
Women still the sex class in international elite sports:
http://viv.id.au/blog/?p=2066
Posted by C.K.
August 15, 2008, 12:29 AM
I say who cares?
I don't like that some sports go out of their way to grab ratings with uselessly skimpy uniforms (women's beach volleyball) but I love seeing the athletes naked if they're ok with it. Yes women- I'm wiling to see naked men- but I don't care. But I love seeing naked jocks- and I disagree that it belittles them in anyway.
Posted by MDCO
August 16, 2008, 11:11 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.