Yesterday, Antonia Zerbisias’ column in the Toronto Star hit me like a punch in the gut. The right to choose is hardly a new topic, but new threats to this right seem to pop up every time we turn around.
Although it’s not getting much mainstream coverage, two states, Colorado and South Dakota, have measures on their ballots that would strip women not only of their reproductive rights but would also define life as beginning at conception.In other words, zygotes would be defined as legal persons, with their rights protected by the state.
That would mean that pregnant women would be wholly owned by government, as walking incubators, with absolutely no right to make any decisions, and I mean any decisions, about their, as John McCain disdainfully put it in air quotes two weeks ago, “health.”


Digg
one comment
I really like Antonia Zerbisias' writings. Thanks for the link.
Fortunately, I do not believe that the general Canadian situation is as dire as that of the United States. However, we need to stay diligent when it comes to women's reproductive rights.
I don't understand how 'popular opinion' can be allowed to judge whether or not life begins at conception. I'm a strong proponent of allowing legal abortions, but I don't begin to imagine I, or people like me, have the actual authority to state whether or not life does begin at conception.
In any account, the question of whether life begins at conception has been besides the point for me. I do not believe that the state should be governing this decision of women in this way -- because if people do want to reduce abortions criminalizing them doesn't help. It just hurts women.
Posted by Jenna
November 1, 2008, 10:07 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.