Big ups and kudos go to my colleague Alison Lee, manager of Good for Her in Toronto, on writing a kick-ass feature for the November/December This Magazine on The New Face of Porn, and how a new generation of feminists are reclaiming porn, both as consumers and producers.
Here is her fabulous self talking about her work at the store for This:
I think we go back and forth all the time with the argument about sex positive feminism, what it really means, and how we can practically apply the tools we hear in theory while living out there in a world that is downright prejudicial on so many levels.
For example, I myself struggle with believing the whole “hypersexualization” school of thought because I’m an advocate for choice and self-determination (i.e. I don’t just believe in the decriminalization of sex work, I believe people can and do choose it and deserve more than basic human rights) I look at colonization and remember that we need to take the power back.
I mean, I don’t personally like knitting, crafting, or baking at all but I sure as hell respect the women who have taken those things back as non-second-class-citizen stuff. I’d like the same respect with my penchant for feminist porn and sex trade rights advocacy work, thank you very much. People can argue all they want that comparing these things makes no sense, but to me it does. I remember that healthy sexuality was common practice in a lot of Indigenous and racialized communities before the influx of Christianization, etc, so at the foundation of it all, it’s more than just a reclaimation on sex we’re fighting for. I think people get to decide what that looks like for them.
Even this year at the Rebelles: Waves of Resistance conference we fought relentlessly about our positions on porn, sex work, and other elements of sex positivity that Ariel Troster documented in Xtra.
So what do you think?


Digg
eight comments
The video isn't popping up for me for some reason, but props for a great post. I maintain there is no issue more divisive than that of sex work. Of course there are women who choose it, who love it as a career choice. And, of course, there are women who are there unwillingly, just as there are women who become janitors, garbage collectors, or Taco Bell employees unwillingly.
We *do* need to legalise sex work and lose our attitudes that alienate the women who willingly choose to do that sort of work. Simultaneously, it's important to help those women who want to get out of that work, though. Pointing our fingers at the industry gets us nowhere, and certainly doesn't help the women who want it.
Thanks again for the post, Jessica.
Posted by Derek
December 11, 2008, 2:34 AM
Awesome! I love the music in the background. Reminds me of some 1950s hygienic film they showed us in elementary school.
Posted by Aspasia
December 11, 2008, 10:35 PM
I had just read Alison's article yesterday and loved it, so I'm psyched to see you've posted about it! The video is awesome too!
"People can argue all they want that comparing these things makes no sense, but to me it does." Makes sense to me too!
Thanks for this post, Jessica!
Posted by D. Cole
December 14, 2008, 9:09 PM
Hey Jessica, a question - do you really find that your love for feminist porn is met with scorn or derision amongst feminists you know? I'm not asking in an "I don't believe you" way - I'm just surprised, because from where I stand it seems like porn has found a pretty comfy place in young feminist communities (well, good conscientious porn anyway)and you're way more likely to be looked down upon for NOT being into it. But maybe I live in a liberal bubble... I'm just curious to know if that's the case in your experience.
Posted by Anna
December 15, 2008, 5 PM
Thanks everyone for the comments!
@Anna
Hey Anna, yes I do find my love for porn is met with scorn and derision among many feminists I encounter. I think that experience is based on the circles you are in, so I travel quite a bit and work within small, rural and remote communities who often aren't always exposed to the same things large urban centres are.
I think we forget that national picture across Canada a lot, when we're in urban centres, we sort of assume we're the majority or that what we see is everyone else's reality, but Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal are three cities in all of Canada.
As well, I think that if you belong to a racialized community, that continues to suffer the effects of centuries of sexual exploitation and abuse through colonization, being open with porn and sexuality in general is at times, harder to come by. There's a lot more at the table here than just sex. We're still being eroticized and sexualized not by choice, and White privilege has a lot to do with that.
And then there's the third-wavers, and present day "feminists" who still aren't willing to have frank conversations about sex. That's probably what irks me the most, which is why I mentioned the crafting, baking, and knitting business stuff which I myself have zero interest in, but give respect to those who've taken it back.
Posted by Jessica Yee
December 15, 2008, 9:14 PM
I should add that this is exactly why equitable sex education is so important. Not just sex ed that is queer positive, or associates race and culture as an "oh and that too". But meaningful, relevant, competent, and all-encompassing.
Posted by Jessica Yee
December 15, 2008, 9:22 PM
Oh yeah, of course I recognize there are large differences in attitude and concern between different geographical and economic groups of feminists, and I would very much expect (and welcome) differences of opinion and experience between myself and, say, rural women, just like I wouldn't go to Churchill, Manitoba and expect to find bumpin' nightlife. It just seemed like your plea for respect for porn was aimed at the third-wave "knitting, crafting and baking" set, and I sort of thought that DIY porn and reclamation of sexuality was part and parcel of that movement. It's interesting (but kind of discouraging) that in your experience third-wavers shy away from talking about sex.
Posted by Anna
December 16, 2008, 2:43 PM
oh man, i remember that controversy at toujours rebelles (i had a couple of really awkward/troubling/enervating conversations w/ the folks in the 'anti-prostitution' crowd -- groan!). a lot of cool stuff came out of that conference, but there were def some unfortunate moments arising out of that particular 'controversy.' this ariel troster article is fabulous, jess. thanks for including it!
i'm just wondering, though, jess, when you mention "hypersexualization," if you're referring to the decision over whether to include that word in the TR manifesto. i think that conversation was directed specifically towards the sexualization of young girls / children in media and advertising, and had less to do w/ the discussions on sex workers' rights. hopefully, i don't sound like some old biddy if i say that we shouldn't chuck the word "hypersexualization" entirely, when it's used in *particular* contexts to identify specific tactics utilized to dictate and homogenize young women's (and men's) sexuality in disempowering ways -- ways i've seen through working closely w/ youth who are negotiating their developing sexuality in hypercapitalist, heteronormative settings.
i'm thinking back to a great point stacy-may once made at a YWCA conference about how young women are constantly bombarded w/ the message "YOU MUST BE AS SEXY AS POSSIBLE ALL THE TIME (but if you get assaulted/raped, it's your own fault, you slut)." as in, there are very few avenues through which young people can explore their sexuality in empowering/positive ways beyond pervasive and confining patriarchal norms... this is what the term 'hypersexualization' brings to my mind, anyway.
Posted by sarah g
December 18, 2008, 12:31 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.