I am in the thick of submitting the second draft of my thesis. Over the past few weeks I’ve updated essays I wrote over a year ago, saying “yes” to every edit my thesis-supervisor has suggested, and incorporating newer material because my research just kind of stopped at 2007. One of the articles I’ve come across in my search for newish material, “What is Third Wave Feminism? A New Directions Essay,” by R. Claire Snyder, sums up the major arguments/actions of the third wave.
She also stakes a claim:
“third-wavers do not feel the need to spend a lot of time constructing ambitious theoretical analyses or justifying on what grounds they are acting; they just do it.”
And I wanted to pose a question to the greater Shameless community (if you identify as third-wave or not):
When you act politically or feministy do you know the theoretical argument behind what you’re doing? Or do you just do it?
For me, it’s a mix of both. I like engaging with feminism and being an activist/feminist in my community without thinking about the theories and reasons behind it. Feminism is inside me, this is who I am, what action I take is a direct reflection of this gut-feminism. But, I also love to wrestle with theories about why I participate the way I do and contribute the way I do (hence this crazy thesis about the third wave). I’m always surprised by is how easy it is to put the third wave (and younger feminists) into that non-theory category: as if we’re unable to talk our way out of the box we’re in.


Digg
six comments
that's interesting because I always felt as though 3rd wave feminism owed a great deal to theory.
In particular, gender theory a la Judith Butler and eve Kosofsky Sedgewick, and Kate Bornstein etc..
I am not good at names but in addition to queer/gender theory in the arts and culture third wave academics explored how craft and other kinds feminized and sometimes racialized cultural labour interacted with social legitimacy and power, as what I considered a third wave feminist analysis.
Which brings me finally to sex-work which is a huge domain where the academy and activism overlap.
So yeah, I don't think it's and either/or. The third wave is closely bound to academic thought, but has also challenged some of the exclusivity of academic circles by bringing the analysis into the streets, and using non-exclusive language/practices.
With the exception of this comment of course, because it's totally jargony and impenetrable ;) but I just woke up.
Okay the shorter way to say that is the personal is political, so feeling feminism as an integral part of oneself doesn't mean there is a lack of theory or analysis it just means the analysis is personally important, and linked to a 'life' outside of the neat ideas.
Which is probably why third wave academics challenge the usual intellectual system, by staying attached to our ideas as parts of ourselves, and not trying to enforce some bizarre separation of thought from experience.
Posted by Miriam
June 11, 2009, 9:04 AM
Is Shameless magazine still being printed? There was no issue for Spring 2009 and many magazines are closing down. Could someone please update the blog to indicate if there is a new issue coming?
Posted by Jen
June 12, 2009, 1:48 PM
Shameless is still in business, and weathering the recession surprisingly well. We just have a slightly erratic publication schedule. The next issue is due out later this month.
Posted by Cate
June 12, 2009, 2:22 PM
Hi Jen - There is a new issue in production right now! Not to worry, we're still printing, and will be for a long time!
Posted by Stacey May
June 12, 2009, 2:22 PM
Diandra, thanks for this very good question.
I think that my feminist awakening (cliche much?), much like most women's feminist awakenings, was born not out of reading feminist theory but of a basic instinct that told me "Hey! Something here isn't right!" Of course, once I identified that feeling with my feminist identity, I began to devour as much feminist literature as possible. Fictional and non. Obviously, theory got thrown in there, and some of it was great - mind-expanding and accessible. Some of it...was not. In my experience, a great deal of queer and feminist theory texts end up being alienating in their hyper-academic language and are difficult to interpret without some sort of "expert" - i.e. someone in a position of privilege and authority (like a prof). Boo!
BUT...(and I realize this is getting essay-esque) the stuff that IS accessible - Kate Bornstein's work, for example, or my introduction to third wave feminist texts at the tender age of 15, Manifesta, helped me identify certain ideas and thoughts and, arguably, HAVE indeed shaped my actions.
On the other hand, when I call attention to heterosexist or unfeminist speech in others, defend someone or something, or participate in acts of everyday activism, I certainly am not thinking "YEAH! Just like Kate told me to in 'My Gender Workbook'!". It's more like: 'YEAH! This is how it is'!
I hope there was an answer in there somewhere. Eeash.
Posted by clara bee
June 13, 2009, 6:25 PM
Clara Bee and Mir... thanks for your thoughts! Theory is really important (I love it) and I think the third wave or just "young" feminists in general have expanded upon the personal is political and worked to integrate politics more into our lives.
After I wrote this post I finished the article and she concluded by saying that the third wave isn't a movement--and it might never be.
I definitely got my back up. The article was only published 1/2 a year ago! It makes me feel more fueled to do my thesis, that's for sure. But also sad that our feminisms aren't considered feminisms important enough to constitute a movement. It definitely is frustrating.
Posted by diandra
June 15, 2009, 9:40 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.