I’d like to start my month-long series on size acceptance with a general overview of some of the terms and concepts I’ll be building discussions on.
One of the main issues in the movement is actually what to call it. While I have settled on the term “size acceptance,” many folks in the movement use “fat acceptance” to describe what they do. This term works because most of the negative stereotypes and body-bashing these people seek to refute are about fat people. Some other activists choose the term “size acceptance” to reflect the fact that people of all shapes and sizes are affected by stereotypes, lazy science, expectations, eating disorders, etc. I take this approach because I think that society’s standards for acceptable body size and shape harm everyone, but I don’t quarrel with the term “fat acceptance” one bit. It’s true that fat people experience a different kind of discrimination and pressure, and that in general, Western society demonizes fat.
One of the most prominent alternatives to the “thinner is better” paradigm is a concept called Health at Every Size (HAES). The idea is simply that health can be measured in so many ways that are completely separate from weight, and that one can be fat and healthy. Or thin and healthy. Or disabled and healthy. Or with a chronic illness and healthy. “Health” can be defined differently for everyone! Practicing HAES means respecting diversity of sizes and shapes, eating for pleasure as well as trying a diversity of nutritious food, and enjoying whatever types of movement your body is capable of and make you feel good. Doesn’t that sound nicer than counting calories and punishing your body with exercise you feel you have to do? Trust me, having experienced both: it is way nicer.
Finally, a major part of size acceptance is the concept of body autonomy. Some people, when they first hear about the movement, think that it means we’re telling everyone to eat only junk food, never exercise, and be fat. Setting aside the fact that not everyone who eats a lot of junk food and lives a sedentary lifestyle is fat (more on the connections between fat and health in a future post), the assertion is ridiculous. The whole concept of size acceptance is rooted in accepting your size, be it fat, thin, or anything in between. By extension, this also means accepting others’ sizes and respecting their bodies and the ways they choose to use them. You do not owe it to anyone else, and they do not owe it to you, to fit a certain size or personal aesthetic. Your body is no one’s business but your own.
Next up: debunking some of the myths about body size and health.


Digg
seven comments
wonderfully written :)
Posted by Ellen
November 2, 2009, 1:10 AM
Love this!!!
Posted by D. Cole
November 2, 2009, 11:05 AM
Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!!
Posted by Lisa
November 2, 2009, 12:49 PM
Wonderful start! Keep 'em coming:)
Posted by Andrew
November 2, 2009, 8:31 PM
i really like that you highlighted the fact that bodily autonomy (i.e. the right to make decisions about your own body, preferably without other people judging you for those decisions) is a basic part of this movement. i really think that it's the basis for a lot of social justice work - whether it's reproductive justice or queer liberation or anti-racist work or anti-ableist work, we're fighting to not have other people make judgements about or affect our ability to make choices about our own bodies.
Posted by fireeyed
November 3, 2009, 2:32 PM
I like "fat acceptance". It reclaims the word "fat" and that's a radical idea I can see working that makes me happy. In the same way that feminism is centered on womens'rights, although it ultimately has sweeping advantages for men and everybody else in the world, in the same way that disability rights are first of all for those who are directly effected because they have disabilities--I-in that same way I think this should be called fat acceptance. It comes, first and foremost, as an assertion of the rights of fat women. We need not to be afraid to name that, to use the word "fat". All this euphemism about fat only increases fear. The public should be considered smart enough to relate to this movement no matter what we call it, but let's be honest. Much though it benefits all of us, the core group this is about is not just anybody and that's fine. Why does it need to be? Femmenism already has plenty of affirmation of all body sizes nd types under the umbrella of "body image" debate. This extends that dialogue, true, but in a particular way. As a woman who isn't one of the main stakeholders in fat acceptance, I think calling it that helps make clear that some of us have more privilege than others size-wise. Can't wait to hear more!
Posted by Myra
November 5, 2009, 12:01 AM
Thanks for all the comments!
@FireEyed: the bodily autonomy aspect was what appealed to me most early on in my journey; the idea that my body is not public property seems so obvious now, but can be hard to grasp when you're in the throes of body-hate.
@Myra: thanks so much for your comment about privilege. It's something that comes up a lot in discussions on FA: who gets to be called fat, how people who are less fat can contribute to the discussion, how challenges increase depending on your placement on the size spectrum. Acknowledging size privilege is extremely important in these discussions!
Posted by Julia
November 5, 2009, 2:05 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.