(via flickr user masaaki miyara)
Over two weeks have passed since the death of mystified literary icon, J.D. Salinger, the author of The Catcher in the Rye and creator of its angst-ridden and much-loved antihero Holden Caulfield. Headlines and obituaries emphasize Salinger’s reclusive and secretive lifestyle, mentioning diehard fans’ wild goose chases for the man in his small town of Cornish, New Hampshire.
Although Mikki Halpin at Salon.com says she understands the appeal to see Salinger as a “higher intellect who has rejected it all,” she also finds this portrait of him “curious,” suggesting it conveniently bars the public from facing some uneasy assertions about the late writer’s relationships with women.
Halpin relies on the accounts of people who knew Salinger.
Nancy Norwalk, a librarian from the Philip Read Memorial Library that Salinger regularly visited, described him as a townsperson, according to Katie Zezima from The New York Times.
“[In Cornish] Mr. Salinger was just Jerry, a quiet man who arrived early to church suppers, nodded hello while buying a newspaper at the general store and wrote a thank-you note to the fire department after it extinguished a blaze and helped save his papers and writings,” wrote Zezima.
Regardless, the image of Salinger as a recluse persists.
Both Salinger’s daughter Margaret and ex-lover Joyce Maynard have also penned memoirs detailing their experiences with the man, and they didn’t paint a pretty picture of him either. Both women were largely condemned by the media as liars and attention seekers.
Halpin explains why:
“As feminists have long known, the personal is political, and women who tell unpleasant truths rarely find a receptive audience. Anyone who got into an argument about Roman Polanski this past year knows how desperately fans can cling to their icons, despite clear evidence of wrongdoing. Acknowledging the experiences of Margaret Salinger or Joyce Maynard would mean deviating from the Salinger myth.”
Halpin presents an intriguing, alternative depiction of a man known for lamenting the omnipresence of phonies around him. I suggest checking out her article for those of you who can’t resist the insatiable pull to learn more about a man who would’ve rather remained a mystery. You wouldn’t be alone.




Digg
three comments
Despite some interesting insight, the Halpin article didn't explain much of what Salinger actually did (I suppose she thought readers already knew?). The articles about his daughter and Joyce Maynard did, however, and it boils down to Salinger's inability to accept people for being human.
Even with my little knowledge of his work, I could see how he could be that kind of person. That sort of attitude can be damaging to anyone with an emotional interest in you- it seems he spurned his daughter, and in the case of Maynard, he was upset that she had the capacity to be sociable (which in his mind, supposedly, was an awful thing to be).
Posted by Steve
February 12, 2010, 1:07 AM
I'll read the article hungrily, thanks. I do think, however that whatever the author wrote should be considered in any passing of judgment. I hear it's pretty powerful stuff and that's part of him, surely, as well.
Posted by Myra
February 12, 2010, 9:32 AM
I wonder what J.D. Salinger's life was like growing up. The sad part about him being a recluse, regardless of how he treated people, was that no one ever really got to learn what made him the way he was and no one ever really got to know if he was as crazy as everyone thought.
I think in our society of cell phones and instant messages, where I can sit in one room and talk to someone in the other without moving, or when I can reach almost anyone, anywhere, at any time with little to no effort at all; it is hard for us to understand the desire to be alone. It leads us to believe that people are crazy when they express a desire to just be left alone and we cannot understand who would not want to jump into this technological world that we are living in.
Posted by Courtney Burrow
April 1, 2010, 12:13 AM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.