Shameless Wire, our new training program for young journalists, is in
full swing. Over the next few months, we’ll be publishing a number of
guest posts by Wire participants. This first series responds to
Toronto city councillor and mayoral candidate Giorgio Mammoliti’s
platform, which calls for a city-wide teen curfew.
by BerBer Xue
Councilor Giorgio Mammoliti has been pushing for a teen curfew for half a decade now, and he’s not stopping because of his run for Toronto mayor. I, for one, do not like the fact that Mammoliti wants to pass a curfew that will dictate how our lives are lived.
Mammoliti’s logic for this curfew is that it will reduce the number of murders in Toronto, but he is playing on fear, not logic. People are afraid of guns. People are afraid of teenagers. A natural instinct would be to suffocate that threat of teenagers wielding guns until it is gone. But last time I checked, there are not many teenage murderers in Toronto. Watching the news these days, I do hear my fair share of murders and shootings (more so last year). But the majority of these are done by people over 18.
In any case, this curfew would be an overreaction. This is akin to enforcing the War Measures Act during the October Crisis, over-the-top and unnecessary. Parents should reserve the right to set their own curfews, at their own discretion. It should be the parent’s right, not the government’s, because they know their children far better than an impersonal law.
Finally, let’s talk logistics. How is this going to work? There is no efficient way to keep teenagers off the streets at night. It would take a tremendous amount of people and organization to execute this well. Toronto isn’t a small town; there are so many places where teenagers could be. No matter how much the city spends, most of the night owls will be able slip away - we’re like Jell-O in that way.
Mammoliti wants to use teenagers as a scapegoat, but his plan will backfire. I know parents who are not voting for Mammoliti just because of this curfew issue, because they do not appreciate Mammoliti’s insinuations. If only youth could also vote, just for this one election - we would show Mammoliti a real reason to fear Toronto’s youth.



Digg
four comments
When is the next issue of Shameless coming out? It feels like there's more blogging than magazine creating getting done.
Posted by J.
February 11, 2010, 1:42 PM
Hi J.,
We're working on the spring issue. It's been a really busy time for everyone at Shameless (as you know we're a volunteer run organization, so life and other commitments sometimes hold us up) so we're a bit behind, but please hang in there -- we're trying to get back on schedule!
Posted by Nicole
February 12, 2010, 9:48 AM
Why isn't there a huge stick about this, like there was with the law prohibiting young drivers from driving with multiple same-age passengers at night? Whenever a stigmatized group's movement is restricted because of their identity, it smacks of fascism to me. What can we do about this? Is there anyone protesting? Is there a petition to sign? Is there a postcard campaign? If there's an issue that should bring this generation together, this is it.
Posted by Myra
February 13, 2010, 11:23 AM
A curfew in a city like Toronto is also really a dangerous idea. If kids are going to get nabbed in high-risk areas such as TTC stops or other modes of transportation, who knows how the ones who will go out (because they will) will find their way back home. It leads to all sorts of problems. By marginalizing them it puts them in actual risk, greater than being out later than say, 11pm or midnight.
Posted by Danielle
February 14, 2010, 10:13 AM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.